Skip to main content

UNESDA

Menu Close
Menu Close
Menu Close

TAXATION OF LOW- AND NO-CALORIE BEVERAGES LACKS POLICY COHERENCE AND UNDERMINES SUGAR REDUCTION EFFORTS

Around the globe, governments, international organisations, and industry are making major efforts to encourage people to reduce their sugar consumption. Taxing low- or no-calorie beverages opposes these efforts and is counterproductive: consumers are not motivated to reduce their beverage calories, and the tax is effectively disincentivising manufacturers from innovating and offering more lower-sugar options.

According to the European Commission’s report “The Mapping of Fiscal Measures and Pricing Policies Applied to Food, Non-alcoholic and Alcoholic Beverages”,  taxes based on the nutrient content of foods and beverages have better chances of achieving positive results in addressing non-communicable diseases:

’Taxes based on the nutrient content in foods and beverages, rather than the volumes of foods and beverages purchased, have better chances of changing consumer behaviour in the direction of improved nutrition and health. Additionally, they can promote product reformulation with even larger effects on nutrient intakes than those deriving from a reduced demand for the taxed products.’’ (page 3)

Differentiated taxes (i.e., taxes based on the nutrient content) have a greater chance of stimulating reformulation and encouraging consumers to make alternative choices by nudging them toward lower-sugar beverages and of encouraging reformulation by manufacturers. It is UNESDA’s firm position that any sugar taxation scheme should exempt no and low-calorie products. If a tax is implemented in sugar products, a tiered approach should be adopted. A soft drink tax on low- and no-calorie soft drinks does not encourage consumers to purchase low- and no-calorie beverages nor offers manufacturers any incentive to continue to reformulate their products, undermining the soft drinks sector’s ongoing efforts to nudge consumers towards healthier drink options.

Two individuals enjoying a meal and soft drinks

It also neglects the role of low- and no-calorie sweeteners in helping reduce overall daily sugar/energy intake and therefore their positive contribution to weight management.

At a time when the rates of obesity and non-communicable diseases remain a concern worldwide and public health authorities are encouraging food manufacturers to replace sugar and reduce calories, the recognition of low- and no-calorie sweeteners  as a safe and useful alternative to sugar is paramount:

  • Low- and no-calorie sweeteners in soft drinks have been repeatedly confirmed as safe to use by health regulators globally following assessments by food safety scientific bodies, such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
Two individuals enjoying a meal and soft drinks
  • Differentiated taxes (i.e. taxes based on the sugar content of the beverages) have a greater chance of encouraging consumers to make alternative choices by nudging them toward lower-sugar beverages through pricing. If consumers pay less for a lower-sugar drink than for a higher-sugar one, they have a financial incentive to make an alternative choice.
  • Differentiated taxes may also encourage manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to redesign their existing product portfolio and marketing plans to favour drinks with less sugar, in order to avoid the higher tax rate.

The inclusion of low- and no-calorie sweetened beverages in taxation schemes undermines the benefits that these provide to consumers, including people living with obesity and people with diabetes whose food and beverage choices are more limited1.

Taxes covering beverages with low- and no-calories do not take into account that health organisations globally recognise the role low- and no-calorie sweeteners can play in helping people manage their weight and diabetes2.

  • Consuming a low- or no-calorie sweetened beverage instead of the sugar-sweetened version can help reduce overall daily sugar and calorie intake3. Lower sugars and calorie intake can help with weight loss and maintenance, as supported by results of long term studies in both adults and children4. Choosing a low- or no-calorie sweetened beverage rather than a sugar-containing drink may be particularly beneficial to both adults and children who are overweight or obese5.

 

  • By reducing the calorie content of food while retaining sweetness, low- and no-calorie sweeteners can also satisfy a desire for sweet food and drink while helping control weight. People who were previously overweight or obese and have managed to maintain long term weight loss report drinking more low- and no-calorie sweetened beverages, suggesting they may be an important aspect of a successful weight loss maintenance strategy6.

 

Evidence also shows that low- and no-calorie sweeteners do not raise blood glucose levels or affect blood glucose control. The availability of approved low- and no-calorie sweeteners has therefore made possible a wider range of lower sugar products that can provide a greater choice for people with diabetes7.

 

1 Reynolds, A., et al., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05894-8; Brown, J., et al., 2022 https://obesitycanada.ca/guidelines/nutrition/

2 Reynolds, A., et al., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05894-8; Brown, J., et al., 2022 https://obesitycanada.ca/guidelines/nutrition/; Skurk, T., et al., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1055/a- 1624-5095; Dyson, P. A., et al., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13603; Helsedirektoratet.
Nasjonal faglig retningslinje for diabetes. 2022; Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/diabetes

3 World Health Organization, M. Rios-Leyvraz, and J. Montez, 2022 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240046429

4 WHO Europe HBSC Surveys, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018.

5 Laviada-Molina, H., et al., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13020; Katan, M.B., et al., 2016 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159771

6 Phelan, S., et al., 2005 https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.147

7 Nichol AD, Holle MJ, An R., 2018 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0170-6

Current water challenges

We cannot deny the current water challenges our world is facing. We are experiencing increased water scarcity, with demands for safe, usable water exceeding supply in many areas, including in Europe. 

  • Freshwater use has been growing by about 1% per year since the 1980s and as water demand is expected to continue increasing at a similar rate until 2050, this will account for an increase of 20 to 30% above the current level of water use1.
  • This increase in water demand is leading to a reduction of renewable water resources of 24% per capita in Europe2
  • Around 30% of the European population lives in areas with permanent water stress and up to 70% live in areas with seasonal water stress during summer3.
  • Europe’s aquatic ecosystems are severely degraded: only 17% of protected river, lake, alluvial, and riparian habitats are in good conservation status and 90% of protected wetland habitats are classified as poor or bad4.
  • Globally, 85% of wetlands have been lost in the last 300 years, with more than 50% lost since 19905. This is particularly critical as wetlands play an important role in filtering water and removing pollutants, as well as providing shelter to wildlife and capturing carbon.

 

This situation entails severe risks for the world’s population. 

  • For the last decade, the World Economic Forum has placed water-related risks among the world’s top five in its annual Global Risks Report. 
  • Water-related disasters have also dominated the list of disasters over the past 50 years and account for 70% of all deaths related to natural disasters6.
  • Nearly 95% of infrastructure loss and damage reported between 2010 to 2019 were due to water-related disasters7
  • More frequent and intensive flooding has cost lives and livelihoods across Europe, while at the same time, more than 50% of the continent has, in recent years, been affected by extreme drought conditions, which also breed a range of negative social, economic and human outcomes8.

A situation driven by a combination of factors

The deterioration of the natural water cycle stems from a confluence of factors: growing urbanisation, growing populations, increased consumption, poor management, pollution, lack of or damaged infrastructure, and climate change.  

Agriculture was responsible for 59% of total freshwater use in Europe in 20179, while industrial and domestic uses are the main drivers of increasing water demand. Indeed, as economies industrialise, populations urbanise and water supply and sanitation systems expand. 

Additionally, rising temperatures and more extreme weather patterns are causing more droughts and flooding. Climate variability is also bringing more uncertainty as to the availability, predictability and geographical distribution of water. Water and climate change are inextricably linked. From unpredictable rainfall patterns to shrinking ice sheets, rising sea levels, floods and droughts – most impacts of climate change come down to water (UN Water).