Skip to main content

UNESDA

Menu Close
Menu Close
Menu Close

WHAT ARE LOW- AND NO-CALORIE SWEETENERS?

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners are food ingredients used in foods and drinks to provide a sweet taste with no or hardly any calories. This makes them a useful tool in helping consumers to manage their total calorie intake as part of a healthy lifestyle.

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners have a much higher intensity of sweetness per gram than sugar, which is the reason why they can be used in very small quantities to achieve the same level of sweetness of sugar. 

For more information on low- and no-calorie sweeteners, the International Sweeteners Association (ISA) is an authoritative source providing science-based information on these ingredients to support public understanding of their safety and benefits. The ISA publishes scientific analyses of the latest research on sweeteners and provides user-friendly factsheets.

WATCH OUR VIDEO

ARE LOW- AND NO-CALORIE SWEETENERS SAFE?

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners are amongst the most thoroughly researched ingredients in the world.

All of the low- and no-calorie sweeteners used in foods and drinks in Europe today, including aspartame and acesulfame-K, have been subjected to rigorous safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

For example:

  • EFSA has repeatedly reconfirmed the safety of aspartame. Its latest scientific opinion, released in 2013, concluded that aspartame is safe for the general population, including for infants, children and pregnant women. In 2018, the U.S. FDA also re-affirmed the safety of aspartame and, in 2023, it reconfirmed that aspartame is safe. In July 2023, WHO/FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), the leading global expert on the safety of food additives, reaffirmed the safety of aspartame, re-confirming the ‘Acceptable Daily Intake’ (ADI) of 0-40 mg per kg body weight per day (see JECFA summary findings). This ADI remains the same as the one established by EFSA.

 

  • EFSA reconfirmed the safety of acesulfame K in 2025. In its scientific review, EFSA concluded that acesulfame-K is safe and considerably raised the acceptable daily intake (ADI) from 9 mg/kg body weight per day to 15 mg/kg per day.

 

  • In 2026, EFSA reaffirmed that sucralose is safe for use at the established Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 15 mg/kg body weight per day. EFSA’s re-evaluation is based on one of the most comprehensive reviews in the past 20 years, covering data on short- and long-tern effects, exposure assessments, and manufacturing processes – and aligns with numerous previous evaluations by other international and national food safety authorities, including the FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).

 

  • In September 2026, EFSA re-affirmed the safety of aspartame-acesulfame salt and its two components – aspartame and acesulfame-K (“Ace-K”), based on the full body of available scientific evidence, including new evidence on aspartame that has become available since the 2013 EFSA scientific opinion.

    EFSA has also reconfirmed the established Acceptable Daily Intakes (ADIs) for aspartame (40 mg/kg body weight per day) and acesulfame (15 mg/kg body weight per day), concluding that current exposure estimates across all age groups remain below these ADIs.

    When it comes to aspartame, EFSA clearly stated: “Available evidence does not support a causal link between current dietary exposure to E 951 and adverse health effects such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, haematotoxicity, neurotoxicity, developmental effects, general toxicity or toxicity in any organ or tissue, or disturbances in glucose regulation.”

 

Only sweeteners assessed as safe by EFSA and then authorised by the EU institutions can be used in food and drink products in the EU. In the approval process, EFSA sets an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for each low- and no-calorie sweetener. The ADI is the amount of low- and no-calorie sweetener that can be safely consumed on a daily basis throughout a person’s lifetime without risk to health. Based on the ADI, the European institutions set an EU regulatory maximum permitted level for each sweetener in each specific relevant food and drink category.

In addition to the European process, safety assessments of sweeteners are also carried out by international food safety authorities such as the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) of the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization. Many national regulatory and food safety agencies across the world also conduct safety assessments.

 

WATCH OUR VIDEO

WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF LOW- AND NO-CALORIE SWEETENERS?

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners can be used to reduce or replace the sugars used in foods and beverages. In soft drinks which contain sugar, it is usually the sugar that provides most of the calories, which is why its replacement with low- and no-calorie sweeteners can assist with weight management.

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners can also help with the management of diabetes as they do not affect blood sugar levels.

WATCH OUR VIDEO

WHY ARE LOW- AND NO-CALORIE SWEETENERS USED IN SOFT DRINKS?

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners provide a sweet taste, yet with no or very few calories. This allows soft drinks producers to innovate to develop new low- and no-calorie products with different sweetness levels in order to help consumers to manage their calorie intake from soft drinks.

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners are therefore an integral part of the soft drinks sector’s sugar reduction actions to offer more choice with less sugar, in support of public health recommendations to reduce excessive sugar consumption. In addition to using low- and no-calorie sweeteners, the soft drinks industry is also investing in further promoting low- and no-calorie beverages to actively encourage consumer choice towards these products. Low- and no-calorie drinks currently represent over 40% of soft drinks’ sales in some European countries. 

 

HOW CAN I CHECK IF FOODS AND DRINKS CONTAIN LOW- AND 
NO-CALORIE SWEETENERS?

In European Union food labelling legislation, the presence of a low- and no-calorie sweetener in foods and drinks must be indicated on the label as ‘’with sweetener(s)’’ and also in the list of ingredients (“sweetener” plus full name or E-number of the sweeteners used in the product).
The E-number indicates that it has been approved as safe for use in foods and beverages in Europe.

 

WHAT ARE THE LOW- AND NO-CALORIE SWEETENERS USED IN FOODS AND DRINKS?

There are several types of low- and no-calorie sweeteners used in food and drink products like soft drinks, desserts, dairy products, sweets, chewing gum, and low-calorie and weight control products.

The four low- and no-calorie sweeteners most frequently used in soft drinks are acesulfame K, aspartame, steviol glycosides (stevia), and sucralose.

KEY FACTS ABOUT SWEET TASTE

Sweet taste in beverages mainly comes from sugars or from low- and no-calorie sweeteners.

A liking for sweet taste is innate, is mainly genetically determined, and generally decreases as we age.

Despite popular belief, there is no evidence to support that the sweetness of the diet needs to change to improve diet quality or health or is related to body weight. Diet quality does not appear to relate to the sweetness of the diet, but rather to an individual’s choice of total foods and beverages and the amounts of other nutrients they provide to the diet.

The suggestion that consuming sweet foods and beverages encourages a greater liking for sweet taste in general is not supported by scientific research. The conclusion of a 2024 review of more recent research by Mela, D. and Risso, D. is consistent with the existing science, providing no empirical support for a causal link between consuming sweet tasting foods and drinks and a general increase in the liking or desire for sweetness.

Science also indicates that the provision of sweetness (via low- and no-calorie sweeteners) can help in reducing sugars and calorie intake, which suggests that provision of sweetness does not hinder sugars or calorie reduction efforts (read this study and this WHO review).

KEY RESOURCES

Current water challenges

We cannot deny the current water challenges our world is facing. We are experiencing increased water scarcity, with demands for safe, usable water exceeding supply in many areas, including in Europe. 

  • Freshwater use has been growing by about 1% per year since the 1980s and as water demand is expected to continue increasing at a similar rate until 2050, this will account for an increase of 20 to 30% above the current level of water use1.
  • This increase in water demand is leading to a reduction of renewable water resources of 24% per capita in Europe2
  • Around 30% of the European population lives in areas with permanent water stress and up to 70% live in areas with seasonal water stress during summer3.
  • Europe’s aquatic ecosystems are severely degraded: only 17% of protected river, lake, alluvial, and riparian habitats are in good conservation status and 90% of protected wetland habitats are classified as poor or bad4.
  • Globally, 85% of wetlands have been lost in the last 300 years, with more than 50% lost since 19905. This is particularly critical as wetlands play an important role in filtering water and removing pollutants, as well as providing shelter to wildlife and capturing carbon.

 

This situation entails severe risks for the world’s population. 

  • For the last decade, the World Economic Forum has placed water-related risks among the world’s top five in its annual Global Risks Report. 
  • Water-related disasters have also dominated the list of disasters over the past 50 years and account for 70% of all deaths related to natural disasters6.
  • Nearly 95% of infrastructure loss and damage reported between 2010 to 2019 were due to water-related disasters7
  • More frequent and intensive flooding has cost lives and livelihoods across Europe, while at the same time, more than 50% of the continent has, in recent years, been affected by extreme drought conditions, which also breed a range of negative social, economic and human outcomes8.

A situation driven by a combination of factors

The deterioration of the natural water cycle stems from a confluence of factors: growing urbanisation, growing populations, increased consumption, poor management, pollution, lack of or damaged infrastructure, and climate change.  

Agriculture was responsible for 59% of total freshwater use in Europe in 20179, while industrial and domestic uses are the main drivers of increasing water demand. Indeed, as economies industrialise, populations urbanise and water supply and sanitation systems expand. 

Additionally, rising temperatures and more extreme weather patterns are causing more droughts and flooding. Climate variability is also bringing more uncertainty as to the availability, predictability and geographical distribution of water. Water and climate change are inextricably linked. From unpredictable rainfall patterns to shrinking ice sheets, rising sea levels, floods and droughts – most impacts of climate change come down to water (UN Water).